EduStream

The first version was a spreadsheet

In 2019 we were three people running an internal training programme, and the most useful thing we produced was a spreadsheet: for each subject, which course to take first, which to skip, and which one people always wished they had started with.

The spreadsheet got passed around. It kept being right. That was the whole insight, and it is still the product: the ordering matters more than the catalogue.

Seven years later there are 1,200 paths and 34 people, and we still turn down more course proposals than we accept. The constraint is not production capacity. It is finding people who are excellent at a job and willing to explain it while they are still doing it.

The EduStream learner dashboard: paths in progress, hours studied and the next chapter to resume.

Three things we will not trade away

  • A course is a sequence, not a library

    Access to everything is a poor substitute for knowing what to do next. Paths lock the order, and the order is the product.

  • The person teaching should still be doing

    Teaching full time is a career, and a good one. It is just not the same job as the one our learners are training for.

  • Publish the numbers that could embarrass you

    Refund rate, assessment pass rate, median reply time. They are on the site because a platform that hides them is telling you something.

Come and see the work

The first course of every path is free and needs no card. That is the honest way to judge whether any of this is true.

Browse the paths